Disclosure: This post may contain affiliate links. We receive a small commission at no cost to you when you make a purchase using our links.
Solar portable power stations have become increasingly popular for camping and glamping adventures, but if you’re looking for an even more convenient and portable solution for powering your devices on the go, a MagSafe power bank is the way to go.
The Anker 622 and 633 are two of the most popular models on the market today. Both are lightweight, compact, and feature the latest MagSafe technology for fast and efficient charging of your iPhone and USB gadgets.
The Anker 622 is a 5000 mAh power bank, while the 633 is a 10000 mAh power bank that offers an additional 20W USB-C PD port, plus a stronger and sturdier kickstand.
In this article, we’ll compare all the key specs and features of the Anker 622 and 633 magnetic battery banks, and explain why one might be better suited for your needs than the other. Let’s dive in and explore all the details.
Anker 622 and 633 – What to Buy?
The Anker 633 and 622 are probably some of the most popular Anker MegaSafe battery packs the market has. Let us start off with the capacity of the power banks. As you can see already, the 622 is a 5000Wh power bank and is simply beaten by the 633, which has double the capacity.
Size and Portability
Regarding size, both the units are indeed handy and compact models, while the 633 is evidently a bit larger than its younger sibling because it packs a little more juice. There are no dramatic size differences between them, though.
The 622 is 0.5 inches slim, while the thickness of the 633 is just 0.71 inches. In terms of weight, the former is 142g, while the latter is 218g.
There is only a little difference in the overall sizes of the power banks.
Anker 633 Size: 4.21 x 2.61 x 0.71 inches.
Anker 622 Size: 4.13 x 2.62 x 0.5 inches.
The kickstand is another notable difference.
The 622 has a bit of a feeble stand that covers the entire backside of the power bank when not in use, while the 633 has got a sleek, but a little more solid stand. Both the kickstands, as per many users, are not muscular enough to support your iPhone unless you take a deliberate effort to put the setting right on the table.
Let us see what the Youtuber TechnicallyTee says about the stands,
I don’t really know which one I like the best both of them just kind of do what they do in a funky type of way so it’s got to be kind of personal preference.
Both of the Anker power banks have USB-C ports that can charge any USB-C device that doesn’t use a 7.5-watt magnetic wireless charger.
By the way, the 633 also has an 18-pin regular USB-A port.
The 622 is a bit limited as its USB-C port can only deliver up to 12 watts, while its sibling’s USB-C port is a 20-watt unit, which can charge your iPhone steadily faster, and you can also charge another iPhone or an Android via its USB-A port at the same time.
I’m not sure if this (622) is even rated for 20-watt power delivery I don’t know if Anker even gives this (622) an output rating on the website. All it says is that it is the best to use with the 12-watt Apple charger so I’m not 100 sure what the charging speeds of this one (622) is but Anker is giving you basically 20 watts when it comes to this (633).
Anker 622 vs 633 Price
As of the time of this writing, the price of the Anker 622 is around $60, while the Anker 633 is $20 higher.
That has been our take on the Anker 622 and 633 comparison.
We have had a detailed look at the specs and features of the two popular Anker power banks for iPhones and other USB-C gadgets. With different battery and output options, you get two incredible models, which you can choose per your requirements and preferences.
Bobby is a part-time blogger who is highly passionate about off-grid and sustainable power systems and is an expert at researching and exploring new topics, checking facts, and presenting things in simple language. As an avid observer of the global off-grid power and battery market, he is really excited to share with you the latest trends, fresh products, and other developments in the markets.